Government Motives for Privatizing Public Schools in Punjab

Exploring Teachers' Precarity and Educational Equity

  • Khizer Hayat Universitas Islam International Indonesia, Depok
Keywords: Privatization, Government Motives, Teachers' Precarity, Educational Equity, Public schools

Abstract

The pros and cons of privatizing education have long been a topic of discussion among policymakers across the globe. The privatization attempts of public schools by the Punjab government are episodic but persist, resulting in a sufficient amount of tension for teachers and countless concerns about educational equity. The study aims to identify the current motives of the government by discovering the driving forces behind privatization and evaluating the job security issues for teachers and academic quality for students of all socioeconomic levels. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in this study, utilizing a qualitative research approach to learn about teacher perspectives from 2 public school teachers and 2 private school teachers from diverse areas within Punjab to know diverse opinions. Respondents belong in Punjab, where public schools have been privatized. Besides, document analysis was used to compare and contrast government policy motives delving further into the issue. The study's findings show that the government's objectives for privatization include cost reduction, increased efficiency, and a desire to attract private investment. However, privatization efforts have resulted in a decrease in employment security for public school teachers and educational equity for students belonging to underprivileged families. Privatization can undoubtedly have cost-effective short-term effects, but it also puts educational equity and teachers' well-being in jeopardy. Thus, the study proposes that policymakers carefully consider long-term solutions that uphold teachers' rights and prioritize education for all.

References

Abdullah Hussain. (2024, March 16). Punjab government plans to privatize public schools. UrduPoint. Retrieved from https://www.urdupoint.com/en/education/punjab-govt-plans-to-privatize-public-schools-1806001.html
Ahmad Shah Durrani. (2017). Why is there a low standard of education in Pakistan? Quora. Retrieved July 6, 2024, from https://www.quora.com/Why-is-there-a-low-standard-of-education-in-Pakistan
Alam, F., Iqbal, K., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Comparative analysis of public and private school sectors: A case study of Karachi-Punjab. Punjab Journal of Educational Research, 4(2).
Alase, A. (2017). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9-19.
Ameen, F. B. (2024, January 16). Privatization of government schools in the suffocating educational system of Punjab. Paradigm Shift. https://www.paradigmshift.com.pk/government-schools/
American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of Ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 145-156.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brodowicz, M. (2024, March 17). Privatization of education term paper. Retrieved from https://aithor.com/essay-examples/privatization-of-education-term-paper
Busch, M. P. (1996). A descriptive analysis of teacher attitudes towards the privatization of public education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Dayton).
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: an overview. Historical social research/Historische sozialforschung, 273-290.
Gabol, I. (2023, October 15). Handover of 1,000 schools to NGO sparked teachers’ protests in Punjab. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/1781098
Gupta, A., Kanthi Herath, S., & Mikouiza, N. C. (2005). Outsourcing in higher education: An empirical examination. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(5), 396-412.
Hill, D., & Kumar, R. (Eds.). (2012). Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences (Vol. 3). Routledge.
Hussain, A., Hussain, I., & Shabbir, S. Enhancing Educational Efficiency in the Public Sector: A Data Envelopment Analysis of Schools in District Sargodha.
Hussnain, F. (2024, June 5). Teachers union writes letter to Nawaz against privatization of public schools. Punjab Observer. https://pakobserver.net/teachers-union-writes-letter-to-nawaz-against-privatization-of-public-schools/
Kanwal, A., Kamran, F., & Rafiq, S. (2023). Perceptions of teachers on government school privatization in Punjab, Punjab. Gomal University Journal of Research, 39(4), 404-419.
Khan, N., Khawaja, S. H., & Syeda, S. B. (2018). Effects of public private partnership on development of education in Punjab.
Levin, B. (2003). Approaches to equity in policy for lifelong learning. Education and Training Policy Division, OECD. Paris: OECD.
Levin, H. M., & Belfield, C. (1999). Educational privatization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Malik, A. B. (2010). Public-private partnerships in education: Lessons learned from the Punjab Education Foundation (Vol. 309). Asian Development Bank.
Memon, G. R. (2007). Education in Punjab: The key issues, problems and the new challenges. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(1), 47-55.
Muzaffar, I., & Sharma, A. Public-private debates in education: Whither private.
Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419-428.
Punjab. Ministry of Education, Islamabad, Ministry of Education, 1998, 1998, 134 p.
Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Meta-analysis and everyday life: The good, the bad, and the ugly. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(2), 213-219.
Steer, L., Gillard, J., Gustafsson-Wright, E., & Latham, M. (2015, February). Non-state actors in education in developing countries. In The Annual Research Symposium of the Center for Universal Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/non-state-actors-in-education-in-developing-countries
Tilak, J. B. (2008). Higher education: A public good or a commodity for trade? Commitment to higher education or commitment of higher education to trade. Prospects, 38, 449-466.
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (n.d.). Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Punjab. Retrieved July 3, 2024, from https://www.unescap.org/
UNESCAP. (n.d.). Public private partnerships program of Pakistan. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/pakistan_0.pdf
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education: A political economy of global education reform. Teachers College Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications
Published
2024-12-07
How to Cite
Hayat, K. (2024). Government Motives for Privatizing Public Schools in Punjab: Exploring Teachers’ Precarity and Educational Equity. Proceedings of Sunan Ampel International Conference of Political and Social Sciences, 2, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.15642/saicopss.2024.2.15-129