The Significant Role of Employee Assistant Program (EAP) in Company’s Sustainability: Assesing Mental Health Using MMPI 2

  • Meutia Ananda Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel
  • Dewi Mayangsari Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Keywords: EAP, mental health assessment methode MMPI 2, Stress Level


The purpose of this study is to describe the mental health condition of the employees in state-owned company, under change management that resulted in notable numbers of identified burnout in employees. The use of Employee Assistant Program (EAP) is important in this particular case to define mental health condition to determine the sustainability aspect of company's strategy. Employee Assistant Program (EAP) is a program that enable human resources professional to assess, to make referral, and offer short-term counseling services to employees (Masi, 1997). This is descriptive quantitative research with using mental health assessment, in particular, Minnessota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI 2). The assessment was conducted in August to September 2022 to 339 employees and measured their stress level with using MPPI 2 test kit. There were 200 non operator staff and 139 operators tested to distinguish how EAP allow a company to reduce absenteeism, motivating employees to increase productivity, and enable them to cope with personal issues that can interfere the work performance. The initial assessment has indicated several stress levels that show the importance of an adequate need assessment. The research result shows a percentage of 24% from non- operator staff are not experiencing stress, 9% having mild stress levels, 9% having moderate stress levels, 7% having severe stress levels and 58% are unidentified. For operator employees, there are 7.9% of them not experiencing stress, 36% having mild stress levels, 25.2% having moderate stress levels, 6.5% having severe stress levels and 24.5 % are unidentified. From the assessment, company can then Plan, Do, Check, and Act (PDAC) to support the complete EAP Strategy.


Anggoro, S., (2017). Rancangan Employee Assistance Program (EAP) untuk menunjang peningkatan Quality of Work Life (QWL) Pada Karyawan PT. X. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya vol.6 no.2.
Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta : PT. Rineka Cipta.
Black, K.R. (1995). Personality Screening in Employment.
Bophela, N. R., & Govender, P. (2015). Employee assistance programs (EAPs): Tools for quality of work life. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 13(2), 236-248.
Bowen, B. (1997). A Needs Assesment For an Employee Assistance Programe. Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of The Requirements for The Degree.

Friedman, A.F, et al. (2001). Psychological Assessment with MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF Third Edition. Routledge.
Kirk, K, A. Brown, D.F. (2003). Employee Assistance Programs: A Review of The Management of Stress and Wellbeing Through Workplace Counseling and Consulting. Australian Psychologist July 20003.
Li, J., & Yeo, R. K. (2013). In pursuit of learning: Sense making the quality of work life. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(2), 136-160.doi:10.1108/03090591311301662.
Masi, D,A. (1997). Evaluating employee assistance programs. Research on Social Work Practice 7 (3), 378-390.
Merrick,.L. (2011). The role of employee assistance programs in supporting resiliency.
Monfils, M, K. (1995). Needs Assessment and Impelementation of An Employee Assitance Program Promoting A Healthier Workforce. AAOHN Jurnal, May 1995 Vol. 43 No. 5.
Shimberg, A,L. (2020). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). The Whiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Measurement and Assessment, 293-308, 2020.
Steele, P. (1998). Employee assistance programs: Then, Now, and in the Future. New York: Sage Publishing.
Sudjana. (1996). Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito. Sugiyono, D., (2008). Metode penelitian kuatintatif,
kualitatif dan R & D. Sugiyono. Bandung: Alfabeta.
karyawan-alami-stres-akibat-pekerjaan. Diunduh tanggal 4 November 2022.